Papaveraceae

Overview

Family Papaveraceae
Genus 42 (5 assembled genus)
Species 775 (13 assembled species)
SI type Type-3
SI genes PrsS (pistil specific expression); PrpS (pollen specific expression)

Organism Image

Description

The Papaveraceae, informally known as the poppy family, are an economically important family of about 42 genera and approximately 775 known species of flowering plants in the order Ranunculales. The family is cosmopolitan, occurring in temperate and subtropical climates (mostly in the northern hemisphere) like Eastern Asia as well as California in North America. It is almost unknown in the tropics. Most are herbaceous plants, but a few are shrubs and small trees. The family currently includes two groups that have been considered to be separate families: Fumariaceae and Pteridophyllaceae. Papaver is the classical name for poppy in Latin.

SI type

Type-3 is the gametophytic Papaveraceae-type SI, possessing the common poppy (Papaver rhoeas) stigma S (PrsS) and P. rhoeas pollen S (PrpS). Prs S2 secreted by S1S2 papilla cells can specifically bind to pollen membrane-localized Prp S2, stimulating Ca2+ influx, ROS accumulation, actin depolymerization, and PCD of self-pollen.

SI genes

Downloads

Publication

Foote HC, Ride JP, Franklin-Tong VE, Walker EA, Lawrence MJ, Franklin FC. Cloning and expression of a distinctive class of self-incompatibility (S) gene from Papaver rhoeas L. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Mar 15;91(6):2265-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.6.2265.

Wheeler MJ, de Graaf BH, Hadjiosif N, Perry RM, Poulter NS, Osman K, Vatovec S, Harper A, Franklin FC, Franklin-Tong VE. Identification of the pollen self-incompatibility determinant in Papaver rhoeas. Nature. 2009 Jun 18;459(7249):992-5. doi: 10.1038/nature08027IF: 64.8 Q1 . Epub 2009 May 31. Erratum in: Nature. 2016 Mar 3;531(7592):126. doi: 10.1038/nature16181.

Goring DR, Bosch M, Franklin-Tong VE. Contrasting self-recognition rejection systems for self-incompatibility in Brassica and Papaver. Curr Biol. 2023 Jun 5;33(11):R530-R542. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.03.037.

de Nettancourt D (2001) Incompatibility and Incongruity in Wild and Cultivated Plants. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-662-04502-2https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-662-04502-2

Takayama S, Isogai A. Self-incompatibility in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2005;56:467-89. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144249.

Zhang Y, Zhao Z, Xue Y. Roles of proteolysis in plant self-incompatibility. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:21-42. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092108.

Iwano M, Takayama S. Self/non-self discrimination in angiosperm self-incompatibility. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2012 Feb;15(1):78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.09.003.

Fujii S, Kubo K, Takayama S. Non-self- and self-recognition models in plant self-incompatibility. Nat Plants. 2016 Sep 6;2(9):16130. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.130.

Zhao H, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Song Y, Zhao F, Zhang Y, Zhu S, Zhang H, Zhou Z, Guo H, Li M, Li J, Gao Q, Han Q, Huang H, Copsey L, Li Q, Chen H, Coen E, Zhang Y, Xue Y. Origin, loss, and regain of self-incompatibility in angiosperms. Plant Cell. 2022 Jan 20;34(1):579-596. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koab266.

Copyright © 2023-2027 Plant Self-Incompatibility Atlas.