Genus | Solanum |
Species | chmielewskii |
Common Name | - |
Abbreviation | S. chmielewskii |
Ploidy | Diploid |
Chromosome Number | 2n=2x=24 |
Genome Size | 769 Mb |
Genome Assemblies | 1 |
Cross Reference | NCBI taxon: 62889 |
Organism Image
Solanum chmielewskii is sister to S. neorickii, and is difficult to distinguish from that species in the absence of flowers. Both species are related to S. arcanum, from northern Peru, rather than to S. lycopersicum and the other red-fruited species as was suggested by Rick et al. (1976). The flowers of S. chmielewskii are about twice the size of those of S. neorickii and the stigma is always exserted from the anther cone. The corolla tube tends to be slightly larger in diameter, with a more pentagonal corolla outline. Both species have uniform, short whitish pubescence, and small green fruits. Rick et al. (1976) suggested that the outcrossing S. chmielewskii gave rise to the autogamous S. neorickii in their area of sympatry in southern Peru (Dept. Apurimac), near the type localities for both species. Crosses between the two species usually resulted in low seed set (Rick et al. 1976), suggesting they have developed reproductive isolation, at least in their area of sympatry. Hybrids obtained were intermediate in size between the two parents. Solanum chmielewskii prefers drier, better-drained habitats than S. neorickii (Rick et al. 1976) and is found at somewhat higher elevations. The only Bolivian collection is from the Sorata Valley (Mandon 392) which is drier than other yungas valleys in Bolivia, and is the southern limit for other Solanaceae of dry habitats, such as Nicotiana glutinosa L.
Whole Genome Sequences & Annotations for Solanum chmielewskii
Solanum chmielewskii 'ZY60 (cultivar)' ASM2770478v1 S genes
Query | Chr | Size(bp) | Coordinates | BLASTn Hit | BLASTn %ID | Domain |
SLF15 | Chr01 | 89956309 | 1540821-1539568 | Solanum lycopersicum SL2.31, SLF15 | 97.9 | F-box domain |
SLF16 | Chr01 | 89956309 | 1852554-1851373 | Solanum lycopersicum SL2.31, SLF16 | 99.4 | F-box domain |
SLF22Ψ | Chr01 | 89956309 | 41546241-41545107 | Solanum peruvianum KU987616.1, SLF22 | 99.3 | - |
SLF9 | Chr01 | 89956309 | 44070893-44072035 | Solanum pimpinellifolium KJ814875.1, SLF9 | 98.6 | F-box domain |
SLF20 | Chr01 | 89956309 | 45487210-45488376 | Solanum peruvianum KU960913.1, SLF20 | 98 | F-box domain |
SLF6 | Chr01 | 89956309 | 46229641-46230786 | Solanum peruvianum KJ814850.1, SLF6 | 98.7 | F-box domain |
SLF5 | Chr01 | 89956309 | 46278081-46279250 | Solanum habrochaites KJ814915.1, SLF5-S1 | 96.1 | F-box domain |
SLF4 | Chr01 | 89956309 | 46358780-46359946 | Solanum pimpinellifolium KJ814871.1 SLF4 | 96.6 | F-box domain |
SLF2Ψ | Chr01 | 89956309 | 46493419-46494445 | Solanum peruvianum KJ814847.1, SLF2 | 97.9 | - |
S-RNase | Chr01 | 89956309 | 47927568-47927813,47927928-47928353 | Solanum peruvianum Z26581.1, Sn-RNase | 96.7 | Ribonuclease T2 family |
SLF23 | Chr01 | 89956309 | 49327980-49329137 | Solanum chmielewskii MG266249.1, SLF23 | 99.9 | F-box domain |
SLF17Ψ | Chr01 | 89956309 | 49565208-49566388 | Solanum peruvianum KU987615.1, SLF17 | 96.1 | - |
SLF1 | Chr01 | 89956309 | 49914448-49915623 | Solanum pennellii KJ814858.1, SLF1 | 91.8 | F-box domain |
SLF11 | Chr01 | 89956309 | 50559343-50560515 | Solanum lycopersicoides KU987623.1, SLF11 | 99.7 | F-box domain |
SLF12 | Chr01 | 89956309 | 51561523-51560360 | Solanum lycopersicoides KU987622.1, SLF12 | 98.9 | F-box domain |
SLF13Ψ | Chr01 | 89956309 | 52272953-52271751 | Solanum peruvianum KJ814856.1, SLF13 | 98.8 | - |
SLF14Ψ | Chr01 | 89956309 | 55634981-55633812 | Solanum lycopersicum KJ814903.1, SLF14 | 98.5 | - |
SLF18 | Chr01 | 89956309 | 67098384-67099499 | Solanum lycopersicum SL2.31, SLF18 | 99.1 | F-box domain |
SLF19 | Chr01 | 89956309 | 67116638-67115529 | Solanum lycopersicum SL2.31, SLF19 | 98.9 | F-box domain |
The Solanum chmielewskii S gene sequences are available in FASTA format.
CDS and Protein (FASTA file) | S-gene_Solanum_chmielewskii |
Li N, He Q, Wang J, Wang B, Zhao J, Huang S, Yang T, Tang Y, Yang S, Aisimutuola P, Xu R, Hu J, Jia C, Ma K, Li Z, Jiang F, Gao J, Lan H, Zhou Y, Zhang X, Huang S, Fei Z, Wang H, Li H, Yu Q. Super-pangenome analyses highlight genomic diversity and structural variation across wild and cultivated tomato species. Nat Genet. 2023 May;55(5):852-860. doi: 10.1038/s41588-023-01340-y.