Brachypodium hybridum Bhyb26 Assembly & Annotation

Overview

Analysis Name Brachypodium hybridum Bhyb26 Assembly & Annotation
Sequencing technology PacBio, Hi-C
Assembly method MECAT 
Release Date 2022-10-11
Reference Publication(s)

Scarlett VT, Lovell JT, Shao M, Phillips J, Shu S, Lusinska J, Goodstein DM, Jenkins J, Grimwood J, Barry K, Chalhoub B, Schmutz J, Hasterok R, Catalán P, Vogel JP. Multiple origins, one evolutionary trajectory: gradual evolution characterizes distinct lineages of allotetraploid Brachypodium. Genetics. 2023 Feb 9;223(2):iyac146. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyac146.

Abstract

The “genomic shock” hypothesis posits that unusual challenges to genome integrity such as whole genome duplication may induce chaotic genome restructuring. Decades of research on polyploid genomes have revealed that this is often, but not always the case. While some polyploids show major chromosomal rearrangements and derepression of transposable elements in the immediate aftermath of whole genome duplication, others do not. Nonetheless, all polyploids show gradual diploidization over evolutionary time. To evaluate these hypotheses, we produced a chromosome-scale reference genome for the natural allotetraploid grass Brachypodium hybridum, accession “Bhyb26.” We compared 2 independently derived accessions of B. hybridum and their deeply diverged diploid progenitor species Brachypodium stacei and Brachypodium distachyon. The 2 B. hybridum lineages provide a natural timecourse in genome evolution because one formed 1.4 million years ago, and the other formed 140 thousand years ago. The genome of the older lineage reveals signs of gradual post-whole genome duplication genome evolution including minor gene loss and genome rearrangement that are missing from the younger lineage. In neither B. hybridum lineage do we find signs of homeologous recombination or pronounced transposable element activation, though we find evidence supporting steady post-whole genome duplication transposable element activity in the older lineage. Gene loss in the older lineage was slightly biased toward 1 subgenome, but genome dominance was not observed at the transcriptomic level. We propose that relaxed selection, rather than an abrupt genomic shock, drives evolutionary novelty in B. hybridum, and that the progenitor species’ similarity in transposable element load may account for the subtlety of the observed genome dominance.

Assembly statistics

Genome size (bp) 528495877
Number of scaffolds 32
Scaffold N50 (bp) 31901534
Scaffold L50 4
Assembly level Chromosome

Assembly

The Brachypodium hybridum Bhyb26 Assembly file is available in FASTA format.

Downloads

Chromosomes (FASTA file) BhybridumBhyb26_693_v2.0.fa.gz

Gene Predictions

The Brachypodium hybridum Bhyb26 genome gene prediction files are available in GFF3 and FASTA format.

Downloads

Genes (GFF3 file) BhybridumBhyb26_693_v2.1.gene.gff3.gz
CDS sequences (FASTA file) BhybridumBhyb26_693_v2.1.cds.fa.gz
Protein sequences (FASTA file) BhybridumBhyb26_693_v2.1.protein.fa.gz

Functional Analysis

Functional annotation for the Brachypodium hybridum Bhyb26 is available for download below. The proteins were analyzed using InterProScan to assign InterPro domains(Pfam).

Downloads

Domain from InterProScan BhybridumBhyb26_693_v2.0.fa.gz

S genes

Summary

QueryChromosomeSize(bp)CoordinatestBLASTn HittBLASTn %IDDomain
DUF247I-SΨBhD26090406836498550-36499887LpSDUF247-I_chromosome174DUF247
DUF247II-SΨBhD26090406836508687-36509559LpSDUF247-II_chromosome184DUF247
HPS10-SBhD26090406836506937-36507070,
36507149-36507272
LpsS_contig1102938-
DUF247I-ZΨBhS92230611419929183-19930140LpZDUF247-I_chromosome262DUF247
DUF247II-ZΨBhD52737142624809407-24810558LpZDUF247-II_chromosome252DUF247
HPS10-ZBhS92230611419932354-19932528,
19932623-19932732
AsativaHPS10-Z58-

Nucleotide

Protein

© 2023 National Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation / Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences